NAAC - 2023
Document | Uploaded On | ||
---|---|---|---|
4. Quality Indicator Framework (QIF) | |||
Criteria II Teaching-Learning and Evaluation | |||
Key Indicator | 2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile | ||
2.1.1 | Demand Ratio (Average of last five years)
|
||
• Uploaded Data Template - 2.1.1
• Uploaded Data Template (New) - 2.1.1 • Uploaded Supporting Document - 2.1.1 • Uploaded Supporting Document - 2.1.1 |
31.03.23
12.04.23 31.03.23 31.03.23 |
||
2.1.2 | Average percentage of seats filled against reserved categories (SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc.) as per applicable reservation policy during the last five years |
||
• Uploaded Data Template - 2.1.2 • Uploaded Data Template (New) - 2.1.2 • Uploaded Supporting Document - 2.1.2 Covering Letter • Uploaded Supporting Document - 2.1.2 • Uploaded Supporting Document - 2.1.2 |
03.04.23
12.04.23 03.04.23 31.03.23 31.03.23 |
||
Key Indicator | 2.2 Catering to Student Diversity | ||
2.2.1 | The institution assesses the learning levels of the studentsand organises special Programmes for advanced learners and slow learners Write a description in maximum of 500 words |
||
• Uploaded Supporting Document - 2.2.1
• Uploaded Supporting Document - 2.2.1 |
31.03.23
31.03.23 |
||
2.2.2 | Student - Full time teacher ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year)
|
||
• Uploaded Data Template - 2.2.2
• Uploaded Supporting Document - 2.2.2 |
31.03.23
31.03.23 |
||
Key Indicator | 2.3 Teaching-Learning Process | ||
2.3.1 | Student centric methods, such as experientiallearning,participativelearning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing their learning experiences Write a description in maximum of 500 words |
||
• Uploaded Data Template - 2.3.1
• Uploaded Supporting Document - 2.3.1 |
31.03.23
31.03.23 |
||
2.3.2 | Teachers use ICT- enabled tools including online resources for effective teaching and learning processes |
||
• Uploaded Supporting Document - 2.3.2 | 31.03.23 | ||
2.3.3 | Ratio ofstudents mentored for academic and other related issues (Data to be provided only for the latest completed academic year)
|
||
• Uploaded Supporting Document - 2.3.3 | 31.03.23 | ||
Key Indicator | 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality | ||
2.4.1 | Average percentage of full time teachers appointed against the number of sanctioned posts during the last five years
|
||
• Uploaded Data Template - 2.4.1 • Uploaded Data Template (New) - 2.4.1 • Uploaded Supporting Document - 2.4.1 • Uploaded Supporting Document - 2.4.1 |
31.03.23
12.04.23 31.03.23 31.03.23 |
||
2.4.2 | Average percentage of full time teachers withPh.D./D.M/M.Ch./D.N.BSuperspeciality/D.Sc./D’Lit. during the last five years
|
||
• Uploaded Data Template - 2.4.2 • Uploaded Data Template (New) - 2.4.2 • Uploaded Supporting Document - 2.4.2 |
31.03.23
12.04.23 31.03.23 |
||
2.4.3 | Average teaching experience of full time teachers in the same institution (Data to be provided only for the latest completed academic year, in number of years)
|
||
• Uploaded Data Template - 2.4.3 • Uploaded Data Template (New) - 2.4.3 • Uploaded Supporting Document - 2.4.3 |
31.03.23 12.04.23 31.03.23 |
||
2.4.4 | Average percentage of full time teachers who received awards, recognition, fellowships at theState, National, International level from Government/Govt. recognised bodies during the last five years
|
||
• Uploaded Data Template - 2.4.4 | 31.03.23 | ||
Key Indicator | 2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms | ||
2.5.1 | Average number of days from the date of last semester-end/ year- end examination till the declaration of results during the last five years |
||
• Uploaded Data Template - 2.5.1 • Uploaded Data Template (New) - 2.5.1 • Uploaded Supporting Document - 2.5.1 • Uploaded Supporting Document - 2.5.1 • Uploaded Supporting Document - 2.5.1 |
31.03.23 12.04.23 31.03.23 |
||
2.5.2 | Average percentage of student complaints/grievances about evaluation against total number appeared in the examinations during the last five years
|
||
• Uploaded Data Template (New)- 2.5.2 • Uploaded Supporting Document - 2.5.2 • Uploaded Supporting Document - 2.5.2 |
12.04.23 31.03.23 31.03.23 |
||
2.5.3 | IT integrationand reforms in theexamination procedures and processes (continuous internal assessment and end-semester assessment) have brought in considerable improvement in examination management system of the institution Write a description in maximum of 500 words |
||
• Uploaded Supporting Document - 2.5.3
• Uploaded Data Template (New)- 2.5.3 |
31.03.23 12.04.23 |
||
2.5.4 | Status of automation of Examination division along with approved Examination Manual
Data Requirements: (As per Data Template) |
||
• Uploaded Data Template - 2.5.4 • Uploaded Supporting Document - 2.5.4 • Uploaded Supporting Document - 2.5.4 |
31.03.23 31.03.23 31.03.23 |
||
Key Indicator | 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes | ||
2.6.1 | The institution has stated learning outcomes (generic and programme specific)/graduate attributes which are integrated into the assessment process and widely publicized through the website and other documents Write a descriptionin maximum of 500 words |
||
• Uploaded Data Template - 2.6.1
• Uploaded Supporting Document - 2.6.1 |
31.03.23
31.03.23 |
||
2.6.2 | Attainment of Programme Outcomes, Programme Specific Outcomes and Course Outcomes are evaluated by the institution Describe the method of measuring the level of attainment of POs , PSOs and COs in not more than 500 words. |
||
• Uploaded Supporting Document - 2.6.2 • Uploaded Data Template (New) - 2.6.2 |
31.03.23 12.04.23 |
||
2.6.3 | Pass percentage of students (Data to be provided only for the latest completed academic year)
|
||
• Uploaded Data Template - 2.6.3 | 31.03.23 | ||
Key Indicator | 2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey | ||
2.7.1 | Online Student Satisfaction Survey regarding the teaching-learning process. Online survey to be conducted) In progress
|
||
In progress | |||
  centraluniv@ggu.ac.in